Zappa.com

The Official Frank Zappa Messageboards
It is currently Tue Aug 04, 2020 6:34 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:19 am
Posts: 17320
Location: misanthropia
one of my bosses (the main one) at work dips.
he also smokes cigarettes, but wait - just for the break and the "buzz".

pretty respectable.

_________________
that's what happens when you don't read you loose your link to higher thinking


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: Over there! (last)
US plans to curb nicotine in tobacco

Image
The new rules will affect e-cigarettes as well

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is seeking to limit nicotine content in tobacco products, for the first time in its history.

The policy announced on Friday has a goal of cutting back on nicotine levels in order to discourage addiction and lower the number of US smokers.

The FDA says tobacco is responsible for 480,000 American deaths each year, and $300bn (£228bn) in medical costs.

Stock market shares of tobacco plummeted after the plan was announced.

On the New York Stock Exchange, shares in Altria dropped by up to 17%, British American Tobacco's stock fell as much as 11%, and Philip Morris dropped by 7% before they all recovered some of their losses.

"The overwhelming amount of death and disease attributable to tobacco is caused by addiction to cigarettes - the only legal consumer product that, when used as intended, will kill half of all long-term users," FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said in a statement.

The goal, Mr Gottlieb added, is to "render cigarettes minimally addictive" by reducing the amount of the harmful and addictive chemical, which they say is the leading cause of preventable death in the US.

Tobacco companies, such as British American Tobacco (BAT), said the announcement will lead to innovation in the industry.

"Dr Gottlieb's comments regarding nicotine and menthol do not come as a surprise to us," said a BAT spokeswoman.

"We believe future success will require transformative, innovative products and changing the conversation about tobacco harm reduction," Joanne Walia told the BBC, adding that their American subsidiary Reynolds American Inc, will continue "the transformation of the tobacco industry".

The agency announced that they will also look into flavoured-tobacco, such as menthol, during this "public dialogue" period, ahead of a firm policy recommendation.

The policy will also apply to e-cigarettes, which are also known as tobacco vaporisers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 8855
Location: The Thumb
KUIII wrote:
Philostopher wrote:
I used to dip Copenhagen. Does that count? Gave it up about 10 years ago.

I did too. It's been about eight years for me. Late in high school hardly anybody did it then a few of my friends started chewing and I jumped on the bandwagon. What a disgusting and unhealthy habit to do for almost 30 years.


Growing up, I had this neighbor two houses away named "Mr. Hooker" who was the first and only person I knew who would drink coffee while he had a wad of tobacco in his cheek. Yarrgh! Gutting fish on a hot summer day would be preferable to that combination. Dribble stains all down the front of his t-shirts. Made quite the impression at the parent/teacher conferences. :oops:

_________________
*********************************************************************
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: Over there! (last)
Joe Heller
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 36764
Location: Somewhere in time
Wow has anyone proved any link with vaping and ill health?

This crazy crap about second hand smoke has people losing their minds, one Professor at UC Irvine a few years back had done a years long study fully intending to find a link between second hand smoke and illness and came to the conclusion that not only could he not find any, he had strong evidence that he couldn't find a link between most cancer and smoking (Lung Cancer odds increased considerably with smoking).

He wanted to publish and when his evidence and conclusions were reviewed he was told he would have to retract because his findings did not match the Universities position on smoking and they could lose grant funding, he declined and they removed him from the faculty and released him (he was tenured and this required a lot of effort).

It is extremely difficult (all but impossible) to find anything on this story, John & Ken a popular afternoon drive time team on AM Radio in LA covered this in depth for months (maybe longer), John & Ken avid anti-smokers themselves found the behavior of the University outrageous and intellectually dishonest even though they do not advocate for smoking.

This story was buried in a deep grave...it doesn't fit the desired module... :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2018 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:19 am
Posts: 7043
Location: Eastern CT coast
Plook wrote:
Wow has anyone proved any link with vaping and ill health?
not only could he not find any, he had strong evidence that he couldn't find a link between most cancer and smoking (Lung Cancer odds increased considerably with smoking).


So you have these non-coding base pairs at the end of your chromosomes that act as caps to protect the coding dna, (10, 000 pairs at birth, for western dieters-6500 at 35, 4800 at 65).

The mechanism for replication does very well through the coding parts, but it can't quite get the last non-coding base pairs on the chromosome ends, so the protective caps shorten through replication in normal ageing. They are our life-fuse.

We can also do selective damage to cells in certain areas, like lungs with smoking, or sunburns to skin cells, that cause extra replications, shorting these caps (telomeres), faster than normal aging. (there can be direct damage to coding pairs too).

Funny things happen when telomeres start going below 4800 base pairs, one of these is cancer.

Apparently, in western diet countries the pecking order for premature damage is:

1. Endotoxins in meat & dairy
2. Smoking
3. Stress

In that order.

I used to think I could smoke Kool Milds 'till I was about 60, then quit before my immune system got weak.
I wish I hadn't done that.
(I quit at 38).

Probably hard to "prove" on vaping, large number studies would be needed to imply, but combustion produces an crapload of nasties.

_________________
Lesser-evilism is war.


Last edited by baddy on Fri May 04, 2018 4:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 1:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 5:30 pm
Posts: 32042
Location: Windsor,Ontario Canada
Chemicals In E-Cigarette Flavors May Cause "Popcorn Lung"

Read Image http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-me ... pcorn-lung


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2018 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 36764
Location: Somewhere in time
I would still like to know if any of you smart people could find anything on this:

This crazy crap about second hand smoke has people losing their minds, one Professor at UC Irvine a few years back had done a years long study fully intending to find a link between second hand smoke and illness and came to the conclusion that not only could he not find any, he had strong evidence that he couldn't find a link between most cancer and smoking (Lung Cancer odds increased considerably with smoking).

He wanted to publish and when his evidence and conclusions were reviewed he was told he would have to retract because his findings did not match the Universities position on smoking and they could lose grant funding, he declined and they removed him from the faculty and released him (he was tenured and this required a lot of effort).

It is extremely difficult (all but impossible) to find anything on this story, John & Ken a popular afternoon drive time team on AM Radio in LA covered this in depth for months (maybe longer), John & Ken avid anti-smokers themselves found the behavior of the University outrageous and intellectually dishonest even though they do not advocate for smoking.

This story was buried in a deep grave...it doesn't fit the desired module... :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Tue Aug 20, 2019 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: Over there! (last)
My device-of-choice for the past 7 months . . . The Puffco Peak with a ceramic bowl and water filtration. 8)
Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 7:14 am
Posts: 36578
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, CANADA
Now, that's a lot of porn!!

_________________
You're probably wondering why I'm here
(not that it makes a heck of a lot of a difference to ya)
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: Over there! (last)
Rush Limbaugh says he has been diagnosed with advanced lung cancer

Image

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/03/media/rush-limbaugh-cancer-diagnosis/index.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 3954
Location: Oregon
D.C. Judge Strikes Down Warning Labels for Premium Cigars
Feb 3, 2020 | By Andrew Nagy

https://www.cigaraficionado.com/article/d-c-judge-strikes-down-premium-cigar-warning-labels

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration wanted to place oversized warning labels on premium cigar packaging when it published its Final Deeming Rule four years ago, but earlier today a judge based in Washington D.C. struck down the agency’s plan.

“The Deeming Rule’s warning requirements for premium cigars is hereby vacated, and this portion of the Rule is remanded to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion,” wrote U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta in his opinion filed this morning in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mehta defended his decision by pointing to evidence that “premium cigars have different usage patterns than other cigar and tobacco products, they are almost never used by youth, and they are instead used by older, higher income, and better educated consumers.”

When the Final Deeming Rule was published in 2016, one of the major mandates outlined by the FDA was requiring premium cigar companies to place health warnings that cover at least 30 percent of the cigar box—much larger than what was previously required.

The FDA’s warning label scheme has been challenged in two separate lawsuits, one called Cigar Association of America, et al. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al., filed in Washington D.C., and the other En Fuego Tobacco Shop LLC, et al. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, et al., filed in Texas. Two years ago, the Texas lawsuit was transferred to Washington D.C. so that Judge Mehta could decide both cases.

Today’s decision means that Judge Mehta viewed the FDA warning label requirements as illegal, and decided the rules are null and void. The issue has been sent back to the FDA to define what a premium cigar exactly is.

The FDA may opt to appeal Mehta’s decision, but as of now the agency’s plan is undefined.

_________________
“Listen to everyone, read everything; believe absolutely nothing unless you can prove it in your own right!”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2020 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 3954
Location: Oregon
Keith Richards Reveals He’s Finally Quit Smoking Cigarettes
Tom Shackleford | Saturday, February 8th, 2020

Image

What a time to be alive.

Music fans who were taken back by the news that Willie Nelson admitted he’s taking a break from smoking cannabis last year will be even more blown away to know The Rolling Stones‘ indestructible guitarist Keith Richards has been cigarette-free since October.

Yup, Keith Richards, at the age of 76, has finally given up his longtime habit of smoking tobacco.

In a new interview with New York radio station Q104.3, Richards, who’s famously known for his debaucherous lifestyle over the years, told host Jim Kerr that he’s taken a step towards a healthier lifestyle prior to the band’s upcoming North American tour set for this spring and summer.

“I’ve given up smoking…since October,” Richards admitted. “Done that, been there.” Richards also went on to admit that his only remaining vices are that of playing loud rock and roll music and enjoying an occasional glass of Pinot Grigio.

“I think both Mick and I felt that on the last tour we were just getting going,” Richards also mentioned in regards to their 2019 run of shows across North America. “[W]e’ve got to continue this.”

The Rolling Stones will return to the U.S. and Canada beginning May 8th with a show in San Diego, CA. For more information, head to the band’s website.
___________________________
quitting smoking at 76?? I'd say if you've made it this long, screw it!! :smoke:

_________________
“Listen to everyone, read everything; believe absolutely nothing unless you can prove it in your own right!”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NO SMOKING
PostPosted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7781
Location: Over there! (last)
Joep Bertrams
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 389 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group