Zappa.com

The Official Frank Zappa Messageboards
It is currently Mon Oct 14, 2019 8:34 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:35 pm
Posts: 1274
Location: Ohio
I sense a disturbance and a farce.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ows77oKvfxg

_________________
Good writing is clear writing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 5396
Dark Clothes wrote:
What a pointless discussion!

The point is to laugh because this shit is funny.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 33898
Location: >>==> Wellington New Zealand
downer mydnyte wrote:
Dark Clothes wrote:
What a pointless discussion!

The point is to laugh because this shit is funny.

+1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:35 am
Posts: 945
Location: Location: Location:
Trendmonger wrote:

To even think being blown away by Return To Forever, from my perspective that is a total joke. The body of work created by Return To Forever, that body of work is minuscule to that of Frank Zappa and what Zappa Plays Zappa has done with the composers work.

Apples to oranges.

_________________
Check out my band!:
http://burgerfriespop.bandcamp.com/
https://www.facebook.com/burgerfriespop/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 2:41 pm
Posts: 16715
tiboudre wrote:
Trendmonger wrote:

To even think being blown away by Return To Forever, from my perspective that is a total joke. The body of work created by Return To Forever, that body of work is minuscule to that of Frank Zappa and what Zappa Plays Zappa has done with the composers work.

Apples to oranges.


Pfft. Apple to oranges is nowhere near as good as chalk to cheese.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34881
Location: Somewhere in time
WTF! Man I can't be gone 24 hours and the whole site goes to hell and who and the hell let Gary out... :smoke:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 3580
Location: Eugene, OR
The finally got done with him in Guantanamo. Gary's coming home, Plook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:58 pm
Posts: 13142
Location: Home of The Mondavi Center.
Plook wrote:
WTF! Man I can't be gone 24 hours and the whole site goes to hell and who and the hell let Gary out... :smoke:

As slime.o. would say: "you snooze you lose." :wink:



...and but also. :roll:
Did you really think there could be a thread that mentions DZ and Gary wouldn't offer his opinion as soon as anyone badmouths DZ,now didja? :wink:

_________________
I'm getting larger as I walk away.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 3:29 am
Posts: 5096
KAPT.KIIRK wrote:
[
Did you really think there could be a thread that mentions DZ and Gary wouldn't offer his opinion as soon as anyone badmouths DZ,now didja? :wink:


In giving respect to all Zappa.com Newsgroup topics or comments about Dweezil Zappa. Be it if the topic or comment has any given shade to it, for the most part I stay away from commenting here. I do chime in but more-so it is a rare occasion. Dweezil Zappa World is ever so much more encompassing to what Dweezil is doing.

In speaking of this forum, for the most part Forum Areas are not only a community of fans but a place for hostile aggression. This particular community has little to no official involvement. I give kudos to Gail for no longer getting involved here. The GZ sez area works out just fine. Has anyone here ever wonder why the Official commentary at this News Group has all but become non-existent. There is a long history of foul behaviours that are not my cup of tea. In regards to Dweezil or any other topic, some fans have some interesting things to say, but for the most part I do not like how some have treated my friends or the Zappa family.

In the last few years, I dabble in some of the topics and commentary, but even with a wink the harassment soup has no flavour. I never looked to make any friends here. It's just one of those internet news groups that get out of control. I will say that some folks with questionable behaviours are far more interesting and cordial to spend a few minutes with at Zappa shows than on this news group. For the most part I'll leave it at that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 2:41 pm
Posts: 16715
A forum should be a place to air your opinion if you disagree with something. If somebody running a forum wanted to just have fanatic, sycophantic doormats who believe everything should be 100 positive at all times and want them to behave like a brainwashed cult member, then I'd have to find another one. But, I believe that the forum traffic received here is nowhere near the actual Zappa consumer base, and a large majority of fans simply don't give a shit what's written here, have ever been here, and are entirely happy with the product.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 3:29 am
Posts: 5096
calvin2hikers wrote:
A forum should be a place to air your opinion if you disagree with something.

The foul behaviour here has been far beyond having an opinion. My stance is against the blatant harassment towards the official agenda or those that defend it. The adolescent behaviour is so Chumondelian. The all out air assault at times is nothing more than a text and visual assault that is a common trend on many internet forums. The names change but the behaviours are the common thread. I have even heard stories of reputable clergy members getting along well in person but then getting way out of control in internet text domains. It's as if the internet creates a secret curtain for harassment. Not that some clergy members have not been involved in abuse but even the best of them loose control on the internet.

The so called whiners/complainers were rooted in a testament when the forum started a decade ago. Some of that behaviour was far from just having an opinion. Children often whine and complain until they get what they want. Having two kids I try my best to have patience with that behaviour but with Zappa there should be no need for adolescent tantrums. My kids enjoy Zappa with a general sense of joy more-so than most of the whiners and complainers. When the Vault Doors were shut there were far too many whiners. Still today, how the project/object has been moving forward, on occasion far too many still whine like a child having a tantrum. There is no sense in pointing out any individual, but any fan should be thankful for what they have instead of bitching, moaning and complaining until Little Bo Peep's sheep come home.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:35 pm
Posts: 1274
Location: Ohio
Trendmonger wrote:
It's as if the internet creates a secret curtain for harassment.


You just figured that out, eh? Congratulations, Captain Obvious. :roll:

_________________
Good writing is clear writing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34881
Location: Somewhere in time
Trendmonger wrote:
My stance is against the blatant harassment towards the official agenda or those that defend it.



I will be the first to admit there is some, shall we say Bully type behavior and anger, theses are people and like any group these things happen, and like in a family you must exhibit some strength of character in adverse conditions.

But if you were any friend to the Trust and half as connected as you lead people to believe, you would advise them when they may not be doing the smartest thing.

I will defend their right to do what they want with the business they own, they have the complete right to run it right into the ground if they like, no argument from me.

But I want them to be successful and instead of sucking up like some court clown who is afraid to speak-up, you should advise them that not everything is working well. How do I know you don’t, because you back everything as if it is all pure gold, never has there been so much perfection.

So instead of acting all apart and high and mighty as if we are the unwashed masses, if you have the family’s ear you should speak for the fans, give them counsel, bridge the gap…and take advantage of the level of intelligence that exist here.

You’re derelict in your duty as a DZW member, a Zappa Forum member, as a friend of the Trust, and to Human Moral Character.


:smoke:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 6879
Location: Pouting for you? Punky Meadows, pouting for you?!!
FalseDichotomy wrote:
Trendmonger wrote:
It's as if the internet creates a secret curtain for harassment.
You just figured that out, eh? Congratulations, Captain Obvious. :roll:
Not only is it obvious, Trendbarker's the quintessential example. IRONY!!!!

_________________
The way I see it Barry, this should be a very dynamite show.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 3580
Location: Eugene, OR
Trendmonger wrote:
The adolescent behaviour is so Chumondelian.

Can anyone decipher Chumondelian for me? Google hasn't got a clue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 7:11 am
Posts: 1207
Location: Earth
Pope Jim wrote:
Trendmonger wrote:
The adolescent behaviour is so Chumondelian.

Can anyone decipher Chumondelian for me? Google hasn't got a clue.

I presume he means "Cholmondelian", from André Cholmondeley, Dweezil's and the ZFT's arch-enemy: http://guitartour.wordpress.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34881
Location: Somewhere in time
Thinman wrote:
Pope Jim wrote:
Trendmonger wrote:
The adolescent behaviour is so Chumondelian.

Can anyone decipher Chumondelian for me? Google hasn't got a clue.

I presume he means "Cholmondelian", from André Cholmondeley, Dweezil's and the ZFT's arch-enemy: http://guitartour.wordpress.com



I thought he was talking about Chumly from Pawn Stars... :smoke:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 7:11 am
Posts: 1207
Location: Earth
Plook wrote:
… I thought he was talking about Chumly from Pawn Stars... :smoke:

Being European, I don't know what that is.

Why are we even trying to decipher this? Are we out of our mind?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 3580
Location: Eugene, OR
Thank you, Thinman. Good questions, too. I don't know why, but the guy fascinates me. I've never met such a dedicated suck-up before.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 2:41 pm
Posts: 16715
Thinman wrote:
Plook wrote:
… I thought he was talking about Chumly from Pawn Stars... :smoke:

Being European, I don't know what that is.

Why are we even trying to decipher this? Are we out of our mind?


Short answer: Yes. Long Answer: Yes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34881
Location: Somewhere in time
Thinman wrote:
Plook wrote:
… I thought he was talking about Chumly from Pawn Stars... :smoke:

Being European, I don't know what that is.

Why are we even trying to decipher this? Are we out of our mind?



Sometimes you just can't pass up a good joke... :smoke:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 6879
Location: Pouting for you? Punky Meadows, pouting for you?!!
Trendmauler was out driving with his wife. They were having near collisions almost every time they made a turn. His wife suggested that there might be something wrong with the indicators so they pulled over, she got into the drivers seat while he stood at the back of the car to check the indicators. His wife turned one on and asked if it was working and Trendy replied: yes ... no ... yes ... no ... yes ... no ...

_________________
The way I see it Barry, this should be a very dynamite show.


Last edited by polydigm on Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34881
Location: Somewhere in time
polydigm wrote:
Trendmauler was out driving with his wife. They were having near collisions almost every time they made a turn. His wife suggested that there might be something wrong with the indicators so they pulled over, she got into the drivers seat while he stood at the back of the car to check the indicators. His wife turned one on asked if it was working and Trendy replied: yes ... no ... yes ... no ... yes ... no ...



LOL... :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:58 pm
Posts: 13142
Location: Home of The Mondavi Center.
Plook wrote:
polydigm wrote:
Trendmauler was out driving with his wife. They were having near collisions almost every time they made a turn. His wife suggested that there might be something wrong with the indicators so they pulled over, she got into the drivers seat while he stood at the back of the car to check the indicators. His wife turned one on asked if it was working and Trendy replied: yes ... no ... yes ... no ... yes ... no ...



LOL... :mrgreen:

+1 :mrgreen:

_________________
I'm getting larger as I walk away.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 33898
Location: >>==> Wellington New Zealand
To capture his father’s legacy, Dweezil Zappa turns to surround sound

Mike Mettler

Digital Trends
November 5, 2016

“In a very idealistic way, music is the most intriguing art form.”


The mantle of carrying on a great artist’s legacy is no easy feat. Such has been one of Dweezil Zappa’s primary charges for the past decade — to celebrate the ingenuity and inventiveness inherent in his late father Frank Zappa’s deeply rich music catalog. Onstage, he must not only meet exacting expectations of longtime fans, but open the ears of younger generations to a musician and composer many musicologists feel was a man truly ahead of his time.

“That’s the thing that’s so amazing about Frank’s music — that it was so advanced, and the fact that he was so prolific,” Dweezil marveled to Digital Trends. “Sometimes, he made five albums a year. Some bands never even make five albums in their whole career.”

Dweezil’s righteous path to spread the sacred and profane gospel of his father’s music has not been without some controversy. Of late, he’s been at odds with the Zappa Family Trust that’s been overseen by his brother Ahmet, his younger sister Diva, and his mother Gail (up until her death in 2015). Among other things, the ZFT have questioned his usage of Frank’s name and likeness during prior Zappa Plays Zappa tours and for related merchandise.

Undeterred by all the ongoing legal back and forth, Dweezil redubbed his current live run as Dweezil Zappa Plays Whatever the F@%K He Wants: The Cease and Desist Tour, which runs through mid-November. Its main focus is a celebration of 50 years of Frank Zappa music, as his seminal psychedelia-meets-doo-wop double-album opus Freak Out! was released in June 1966.

Digital Trends sat down with Dweezil in his dressing room at the Beacon Theatre in New York prior to his recent Halloween show — a mostly annual tradition that dates back to Frank’s ’70s heyday — to discuss surround sound mixing, what the first song he asked Frank to teach him was, and Frank’s indelible value as an artist.

Digital Trends: You were on a panel I hosted about the merits of surround sound at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas back in 2005. Is surround sound something you’re still passionate about and would like to do more with?

Dweezil Zappa: I have a project that I’m really excited about in terms of how it’s sounding, but the challenge is whether I’ll get to release it because of what the ZFT is doing. It’s for the tour where we did the entire [1974] Apostrophe (’) album. [Keyboard legend] George Duke performed at that concert, so we have him playing with us on songs that he played on the record, and on some other stuff from that night too.

We did the entire thing in surround sound, but it’s featuring a lot of things that are definitely not the normal mode of operation for surround sound.

Give me an example of what you mean by it being “not the normal mode” for surround.

My goal was that I edited the concert visually. I want people to really understand what it’s like to play this music and to live in this music, so you see what you’re hearing at all times onscreen.

As far as how you hear it in surround sound, it changes from song to song. It doesn’t have a “set” format where maybe it’s stereo, and then there’s only a little something in the center and a little in the surrounds in the back.

So as a listener, am I onstage with you and the band, or am I in the audience? Or both?

There are a few different things. What happens is, you’ll have stereo that goes sideways, from the right front speaker to the back left, or you’ll have something that just goes down the sides.

One of the cool things we did was if there’s a soloist, the soloist will be in the front, and the band will get pulled into the back when the solo starts, and it will adjust back after the solo. So you have this feeling of being enveloped like you’re on the stage and stuff moves around you. You can actually feel the music go past you.

We also did a lot with surround sound delays and reverbs, so there’s some really cool panning. Everything is different. It’s a very individual approach for every song.

Is it like the live version of “Zeets” that you produced in 5.1 for the [2003] Frank Zappa Halloween release on DVD-Audio, where drummer Vinnie Colaiuta moves around from channel to channel, sometimes in a clockwise fashion and sometimes diagonally?

(nods) It’s like that — but more. And it’s not just for the sake of being silly. You have these really cool things that make you feel like you could reach out and grab the instrument. With 5.1, you have to use less compression, and there’s more space for the speakers to allow separation. You really have tremendous detail.

Is there one song that you feel you reached the pinnacle of what surround can be?

There are a couple that are really cool — and Inca Roads is one, for sure. (The always adventurous and challenging Inca Roads, originally from 1975’s One Size Fits All, has been a welcome staple in Dweezil’s sets in recent years.) George Duke plays the [synthesizer] solo, and Frank actually plays the guitar solo on it, because we had him on the screen. It’s pretty crazy.

Before we ever went on tour, we did a lot of pre-production to try and emulate as many sounds from the records so we could get them as close as we could. In the post-production, we’re referencing the record to get all the vocal effects, delays, and reverbs so that it’s very close to what you’d have on the studio record, but still maintaining that live context.

When you hear certain kinds of delays or filtered EQs for vocals or other different things, it all shows up in the live performance element of it, and it’s just this very expansive sound. It’s really cool.

The two Frank releases you did in 5.1 at 96kHz/24-bit — Halloween and [2004’s] Quadiophiliac — were both for the DVD-Audio format, but I imagine you’d prefer to put the Apostrophe (’) tour material out on Blu-ray.

Yes. The disc will be Blu-ray, once we get them to the public. The project is essentially finished and there’s just a little left to do with some of the surround sound. It’s pretty much ready to go, but you never know what the Trust will do. We’ll see.

When you did those two releases, it seemed like that was only the beginning of you wanting to do a lot more in surround.

Yeah, for sure. The Quadiophiliac thing was great, and a lot of fun. There is so much within my dad’s music that I think makes it the perfect vehicle for that environment. When people get the chance to experience this particular release, I think they’re going to be excited about it.

One of the things we did with it was test it with this new thing from Waves, the Nx [virtual mix room] where you can make surround sound in a regular pair of headphones. It’s a pretty simple interface where you take something off of the internet and if it’s set up for surround sound, you can hear it that way in the stereo headphones. Everything we had done for a 5.1 speaker setup translated into this pair of headphones.

And that was cool, because it gives one the impression that, in the future, there’s even more opportunity for surround to catch on, because now you could wear a pair of headphones and experience it that way. Many people who have a 5.1 system don’t have it set up right or optimized — and with the sub, they always want to have (pauses), more bass! And then they make it all sound terrible.

We decided to go as wild as we could, to see where it would feel like a gimmick and where the out-of-bounds limit was — but we didn’t actually find any place like that. We never found that. I think a lot of that has to with the fact that the music is full-spectrum in terms of the arrangements and the instrumentation. The more separation you have to localize something, the more it feels like it’s right there where you could just possess it and grab it out of thin air.

When it moves a little bit and you have these things that kind of hover, it becomes so three-dimensional that you find yourself smiling. You go, “This is so cool!” You’re just living in this music. It has nothing to do with the realism of, “Oooh, it sounds exactly like it sounded when I stood in the middle of the venue and watched the show!” It’s not about recreating that experience at all.

Do you have other surround projects in mind? What would you do next?

The thing is, I’m building a studio in my home and once that’s done, it’ll be set-up for surround sound, so I could work on more of my own music in that way. I would really like to.

Oh, man — I’d love to hear you yelling those expletives at John Malkovich from the rear channels on the song Malkovich that’s on your [2015] solo record, Via Zammata’.

That would be great to do — or even projects of other people’s at my studio, once it’s done. I’d like to get into doing some of that stuff.

You can challenge Steven Wilson to be our generation’s surround sound guru. (Dweezil laughs) So let’s get to your wish list. If you could mix any album in surround sound, which one or ones would you do?

Ahhh, mmm. I don’t know. If you’re talking about classic records… (pauses) I grew up listening to and learning stuff from Ozzy Osbourne’s Diary of a Madman (1981) — all the Randy Rhoads parts. So something like that would be great to do.

You asked your dad to show you how to play one of Randy Rhoads’ songs, right?

Yeah, I asked him to show me the chord progression in Revelation (Mother Earth) [from 1980’s Blizzard of Ozz]. It had all these inversions and things that I had no idea what they were.

Just reminiscing through the childhood days of, “This is what got me into guitar” — I love the layering of the guitars on that record. Especially knowing that most of the solos and the rhythm parts are triple-tracked, that gives you a lot to work with in surround.

Ultimately, the goal for doing all this would be to have new generations discover, “Oh wait — you mean I can just sit and only focus on the music, and not have to look at or do ten other things?”

Finally, there’s an often quoted phrase of Frank’s that comes from the song Packard Goose, from 1979’s Joe’s Garage – Act III: “Music is the BEST!” Do you still subscribe to that philosophy?

It depends on what music you’re talking about, you know? In a very idealistic way, music is the most intriguing art form. If you pick it apart and say it starts in one person’s head — if you’re talking about a single artist who’s doing all the writing — and that idea is extracted so that an audience can hear it, you’re hearing this internalized idea.

When you talk about somebody like my dad, who was a complete auteur in the sense that he could do it all — he knew how to write it, capture it, explain it, perform it — you talk about somebody who has such a unique vision, and he’s just taking those details and creating this thing for you to enjoy. It’s got so many levels, and you could spend so many years listening to this stuff, because it has repeat listening value. I think that’s just really amazing.

https://www.yahoo.com/music/capture-fat ... 08678.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group