Zappa.com

The Official Frank Zappa Messageboards
It is currently Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:51 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 4:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 9026
Location: Over there! (last)
Mexico Set to Legalize Marijuana, Becoming World’s Largest Market

Lawmakers in Mexico have approved a bill to legalize recreational cannabis, but in a country still marred by a deadly drug war, the proposal has proved divisive.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/world/americas/mexico-cannabis-bill.html

Rainer Hachfeld
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2021 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 9026
Location: Over there! (last)
John Cole
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 42977
Location: >>==> Pōneke, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Image

_________________
hey punk, where you goin' with that button on your shirt?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2021 6:04 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 7090
Location: Oregon
Image

_________________
“Listen to everyone, read everything; believe absolutely nothing unless you can prove it in your own right!”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2021 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 9026
Location: Over there! (last)
Jaleel White is launching his own cannabis brand, and yes it includes 'Purple Urkle'

Image

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/17/business/jaleel-white-urkel-cannabis-trnd/index.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:46 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: USA
I thought I smelled a skunk downstairs. I then realized the dude that lives downstairs is smoking pot. lol!
Since when did pot smell like a skunk? :smoke:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 9026
Location: Over there! (last)
MOOP wrote:
I thought I smelled a skunk downstairs. I then realized the dude that lives downstairs is smoking pot. lol!
Since when did pot smell like a skunk? :smoke:
Since when? Well, since the late '70s. :smoke:

https://www.leafly.com/strains/skunk-1
https://www.leafly.com/strains/super-skunk
https://www.leafly.com/strains/lists/flavor/skunk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:36 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 7090
Location: Oregon
MOOP wrote:
I thought I smelled a skunk downstairs. I then realized the dude that lives downstairs is smoking pot. lol!
Since when did pot smell like a skunk? :smoke:

Skunk is a fairly common odor in the cannabis world.

What Is ‘Skunk Weed’ and Where Did It Originate?
https://www.leafly.com/news/cannabis-101/what-is-skunk-cannabis

In the 1970s, growers in the USA began to crossbreed short, mountain hashish strains, mostly from Afghanistan and Pakistan with the tall, potent sativa cannabis strains from Central and South America, and strains from tropical Asia. These cross breeds could be grown outdoors in marginal climates in the USA such as northern California, in greenhouses in the Netherlands, and indoors under HID lamps.

Later appropriately named Skunk #1, the first skunk was stabilized as a true breeding variety in the 70’s and is still one of the most consistent and predictable strains available today. Breeders produced a plant that is highly adaptable, very potent, and with a short flowering period.

The original skunk cannabis strains were known to have a very pungent, dead animal-like smell reminiscent of a skunk. Thus, the name has stuck because it is fitting.
...

_________________
“Listen to everyone, read everything; believe absolutely nothing unless you can prove it in your own right!”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 9026
Location: Over there! (last)
Around 1982, I was in a courtroom attending a friend's hearing, and I thought I smelled b.o. (body odor) emitting from my armpits. Later that day, I discovered a forgotten quarter ounce of Maui Wowie in my suit's inside breast pocket. :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:51 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 7090
Location: Oregon
Mr. Nice Guy wrote:
Around 1982, I was in a courtroom attending a friend's hearing, and I thought I smelled b.o. (body odor) emitting from my armpits. Later that day, I discovered a forgotten quarter ounce of Maui Wowie in my suit's inside breast pocket. :shock:

That could have turned into a HORRIBLE situation!

I did something similar in my early 20s. My girlfriend at the time woke up with the revelation that she had forgotten to pay a speeding ticket that was due that very day. We went and picked up a friend and naturally got high on the 45 minute drive to the county seat where the courthouse was located. I went through the metal detectors and search with a metal one hitter in my pocket. Must have not been the right type to set off the detector. About halfway through the line for the clerk of court I reached in my pocket and realized what was in there. I whispered to the others what had happened and we laughed quite a bit about it, though I was still nervous until we got out of the building. I still think about what could have happened had things gone differently....

_________________
“Listen to everyone, read everything; believe absolutely nothing unless you can prove it in your own right!”


Last edited by cory1984 on Tue Apr 20, 2021 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 38975
Location: Somewhere in time
We went to see the Talking Heads in probably 1980 at the Hollywood Palladium, we were into bongs at the time and my brothers best buddy Butch said he could sneak it in, it was at least 18 inches long. We went for he had it in his pants we kind of circled him we had at least 10 people in the posse. We come up to this black security guard he tells us to "STOP!"..."Do you guys think I look dumb take that muther f#cking pipe out of your pants"...it looked hilarious when he pulled this huge bong out people walking by were cracking up. The guard was saying was going to throw us out we were pleading for him to let us slide and so he leaned in and said "give me the pot and I will let you through"...It was a great concert... :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 2:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 4:19 am
Posts: 18408
Location: misanthropia
plewk, plewk, plewk... why do we need to know that the security guard is black?

_________________
that's what happens when you don't read you loose your link to higher thinking


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 3:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:46 pm
Posts: 1419
Location: USA
Thanks for the information about "skunk weed." This is new to me. I'm just familiar with sensamilla weed.
I used to get that by the ounce. It was a wee bit expensive (back then in late 70's), but worth it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 6:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 9026
Location: Over there! (last)
MOOP wrote:
sensamilla [sic] weed.
sinsemilla=no seeds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 5:58 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 7090
Location: Oregon
Collection of American Native Churches Take Federal Government to Court over Cannabis and Mushrooms
Bonnie King Salem-News.com Cannabis De-Classified
Apr-12-2021 01:44

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/april122021/km-spiritual-collective-bk.php

(SALEM, Ore.) - A civil grievance case was filed Thursday, March 25th, 2021 with Washington DC Federal Court by members of the Kautantowit's Mecautea (KM) Spiritual Collective Confederation. The KM Spiritual Collective Confederation (KMSCS) represents several American Native churches.

The grievance case (#21-cv-00879) is against several states and their Governors and Attorneys General and has been accepted by the Court.

Those behind this movement call it “The Grand Case.” It has been in the works for several years as more injustices surfaced and solutions were sought after. Taking these grievances to court is ideal for those involved, after waiting so long for “something to happen.”

According to court records, Plaintiffs allege the Defendants violated their rights by tampering with a witness, victim or an informant (18 USC 1512).

“The Defendants maliciously committed and continue to commit acts of harassment, unlawful detainment, stalking, biased policing, fraud including fraud upon the courts, as well as defamation of character, criminal trespass, unlawful detainment and Theft of property.”

Petitioners/Plaintiffs further affirm acts are based upon, at least in part, “Defendants religious discrimination upon Petitioner churches”, which results in violations of the 1st and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution as well as depriving Plaintiffs/Petitioners of Protection of land use as religious exercise.

Petitioners/Plaintiffs’ claim authority over “God-created and freely given sacred medicines”, including but not limited to cannabis, aka “Marihuana/Marijuana” and the sacred Mannas, aka “Mushrooms” (psychedelic and non-psychedelic) and etc., and say they are being willfully infringed upon by Defendants in order to preserve their unlawful drug enterprise.

Documents say that “Defendants are maliciously retaliating by intentionally depriving the Petitioners/Plaintiffs and “God’s flock” (Church members, associates, immediate family and household members) of their 1st, 4th, 5th and 14th US Constitutional rights... [committing] Damage to religious property; obstruction persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs on more than one occasion.”

The Petitioners of the case are individual churches who have been suffering in similar ways for essentially the same reason and needing the same outcome: clarity, respect and protection against further unlawful retaliation.

They include: Kautantowit's Mecautea (American Native Church); The United Cannabis Ministry; Rolling Spirit Church of KM; Michigan Mother Medicine Church of KM; Reap What You Sow Genesis 1:29 Global (Church); Anointed Life Ministries; Windigo Kahn Church of KM; The Church of The Only Begotten Son; KM Church of Florida; White Wolf's Den of KM; and Wolf Daughter Medicine Church of KM.

Plaintiffs are the Chief Executive Officers of each confederate church, known as shepherds.

The grievances stated in the case are very serious. They include but are not limited to: Violation of Civil Rights, The Shepard and Byrd Acts, RICO, Racketeering, Operating a Criminal Drug "Kingpin" Enterprise, Extortion, Communications Fraud, Constructed Fraud, Domestic Terrorism, Treason, Color of Law/Authority Violations, Conspiracy to Commit Murder, Conspiracy to Deprive Rights, Personal and Religious Bias Discrimination including but not limited to: Violations of Civil Rights Act of 1964,The No Fear Act, The Privacy Act, RLUIPA, RFRA, AIRFA and others.

Defendants include the States of Oregon, California, Utah, Michigan, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Colorado and Florida.

Jack Herer, author of Emporer Wears No Clothes, passed away in 2010. This case is dedicated to him, “because it is by his will, vision, instruction and persistence that the churches handle the issues at hand hindering and hurting our planet plants and people... especially regarding mushrooms and cannabis,” said Joy Graves, KM Spiritual Leader.

“The confederation hopes to see growing support by the cannabis community including the "new industry" and the "canna-Family" alike as well as the uprising "manna movement" and all who support, believe and prefer having the right of choice when it comes to Creator’s creations.”

I asked Spiritual Leader Joy Graves to explain the purpose of “The Grand Case”, their goals and expected outcome.

Q: What does the confederation hope to achieve by filing the "Grand Case"?

J Graves: The purpose of the Grand Case, first and foremost, is to attain “clarity" regarding a few key points: One, the "Chain of Command": The federal government is divided by 3: legislative, executive and judicial. They gave "Limited powers of authority" to state governments, providing they do not conflict with Uncle Sam. So, the states essentially became "employees” of the US federal government.

All their minions then became subject to the jurisdiction of the US federal government and in turn, obligated to follow Uncle Sam's "rules of law" with little, if any, room for question.

Two, “Subject Jurisdiction”: We want it affirmed that no one, including the US Government has claim of jurisdiction over any church or church leader, and that they are not to interfere, infringe or hinder churches in any way.

This includes preserving the well-being of church members, spiritually, physically, emotionally or otherwise. We ask for respect of the churches’ authority over certain medicines, in this case mannas (mushrooms) and cannabis.

Three, “Cannabis disposition”: The US Government should affirm that, from the beginning, they have only had interest in claiming authority over Cannabis Sativa. They created criminal consequences for those that use the herb for any purpose, especially economic gain.

However, they have never asserted authority over Cannabis Indica or Cannabis Ruderalis. Therefore, if individual states attempt to broaden a claim of authority over Indica/Ruderalis, that becomes an issue of battle between the citizens and the state(s) - not the federal government.

Q: Will this case threaten Medical Marijuana" laws?

J Graves: No. What it will do in most states is clear the path for medicinal use of Cannabis Indica and Cannabis Ruderalis without question or [legal] consequence.

It will also bring attention to Cannabis Sativa, possibly putting it in a "limbo" status regarding medicinal use while its disposition is straightened out.

The Confederation is offering the remedy to this conflict for the states. Each state should simply file for an exemption to the federal controlled substance act regarding Cannabis Sativa. This effort includes an application to the DEA for their state and a few hundred dollar application fee. Such exemptions have been granted to churches.

[b]Q: Will it impact cannabis "Recreational Use" laws?[/b]

J Graves: No. This case simply corrects the definitions once and for all. Once the clarification is affirmed, then it will depend on each the state governments’ decisions on how to move forward. Our hope is that this case will reduce the desire to "control" cannabis in the United States.

Q: What will this case do to "the new cannabis industry"?

J Graves: It should be very good for business. We want the federal government to relax their controlling hand of Cannabis Sativa. There is far and above enough convincing evidence that it should be de-scheduled altogether. Once this is done, fairness will be possible. All cannabis efforts will be between the people of their states, not between them and the federal government.

However, if the fed keeps their firm grip as it is today, the states do have the right to file for exemption. If approved, then they pay Uncle Sam his percentage of their profits. But no actual progress is made.

As it is today, "Canna-businesses" are required to comply with all state-made rules and regulations in exchange for the "license" they say will protect then while they break federal law within their state lines.

One of the mandatory requirements of business is banking. Businesses dig in their wallets and take thousands out for their state "licenses", while at the same time, placing a bullseye on their backs.

Banking is required, but FDIC approved and insured banks are bound to the federal rules of law. Law-abiding canna-businesses are constantly having their accounts closed, sometimes losing all the money in their account. Banks justify this theft via a statement that the business is being "suspected of encompassing an illegal drug enterprise (ie cannabis)”.

Technically it’s the states who are coercing them into their banking troubles, allowing them to do business knowing there is no way for them to be financially safe.

The defendant states (and others) are charging all these fees plus fines and penalties, and tax on all sales- while the business owner takes all the risks. This is not right. It is a disservice to the citizens and the business owners.

The “right way” is for each state to get that exemption, pay the fee, and give Uncle Sam his cut. That solves some things. But for now, it is shockingly difficult for canna-businesses to use a bank.

Q: This case claims the right of authority over magic mushrooms in the churches, on what grounds?

J Graves: Their very existence is proof of our Creator's natural law. Mushrooms have purpose and remain here for a reason. The human species has a symbiotic relationship between ourselves and nature.

We stand on the Biblical instruction to Moses in the times of Exodus when mushrooms were declared as sacred medicine by the great Creator, and to be used in proper regiment. We further strengthen our stand behind Aaron, brother of Moses, having authority over the "foods and fountains of living waters of the gods".

The plaintiffs in this case are called "shepherds of the flock of God", or in other words- they include all the human beings upon the planet.

Q: This case attacks Oregon's 2020 measure 109. Why?

J Graves: The State has no subject jurisdiction over our mannas (mushrooms). For them to attempt to push in and claim authority so they can experiment and exploit them is a terrible injustice.

They have yet to respect the church’s authority regarding mannas, though our expertise in the subject is well known.

They claim their interest in the manna is for "health and wellness" and yet they have not reached out or consulted us about them. We know the medicinal values and benefits as well as how to determine proper regiment and dosages.

Instead, they approach our manna ignorantly and disrespectfully. They are selling licenses allowing experimentation, then they will determine who will have rights to cultivate, possess and use them and punish those who they decide cannot.

Of all the places that has expanded mushroom laxation laws, Oregon is the only state trying to assert sole control over mushrooms. Most, like Boulder, Oakland and Santa Cruz, actually liberated the mannas, which is a right step- but Oregon "Regulated" out of left field with absolutely no foundation, knowledge or authority to do.

That is not honor nor equality, it is what they’ve done to cannabis and we are not going to watch that pattern repeat itself for financial gains without addressing the issue. Ultimately it is the churches who have the position to demand correction, and it is therefore our obligation to accomplish.

Q: Why have the filers initiated this case “now”?

J Graves: The degree of victimization is forcing the churches to take swift affirmative action now. The churches are obligated to protect their people as well as the whole of humankind and earthly life, including preserving Natural law.

The current and recent state of affairs in America demand a proactive stance. No one else can make the stand but churches, and most churches are even constrained from attempting to.

The confederated churches on this case are among the few that legally can and who are willing to attempt to preserve our rights, people and planet.

There are also two additional cases currently active in federal court and assigned case numbers. Both are KM's "sub-cases" which ultimately do file in under the wing of the grand case but regard specific sufferings afflicting upon KM exclusively.

Both sub-cases contain a claim for financial compensation in addition to injunctive relief.

Q: If the US government changes its position and the laws regarding cannabis, what would happen to the "Grand Case"?

J Graves: At this point it would only further prove the merit and validity of the grand case. This case being on official record only helps to assure the victims they are not swept under the rug and did not suffer in vain.

We would like to see the government allow nonviolent offenders to regain their long overdue freedom before it's too late for them as it already is for too many such as Richard Flor, a prime example, who died in federal prison inhumanely as far as we're concerned. He complied with the proclaimed "laws" regarding cannabis and wanted to help his fellow human beings from unnecessary suffering and premature death, as cannabis has been able to accomplish for so many …when allowed.

There are still many pot POWs, and we would like to see them released immediately. Their convictions should be removed from their permanent criminal record and they should be assisted with reintegration.

Nearly a hundred years has passed since prohibition on cannabis became the norm in the United States. Thankfully, the empirical evidence of the failed experiment has come fully into focus and the American public is done with this misguided law.

Sadly, many fallen canna-warriors such as Jack Herer, Capt'n Ed, Ric Smith, Doc Leveque and countless others didn't live to see the victory yet to come.

“We hope the Grand Case will bring the nonsense to an end, and truth and common sense will prevail. We redirect all feather from this battle into Jack and their caps... because if not for their efforts and sacrifices, sufferings and deaths, we would not be here fighting to finish the war via this case,” added Graves.

_________________
“Listen to everyone, read everything; believe absolutely nothing unless you can prove it in your own right!”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 42977
Location: >>==> Pōneke, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Image

_________________
hey punk, where you goin' with that button on your shirt?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LEGALIZED CANNABIS
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 42977
Location: >>==> Pōneke, Wellington, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Image

_________________
hey punk, where you goin' with that button on your shirt?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group