Zappa.com

The Official Frank Zappa Messageboards
It is currently Sun Jun 07, 2020 2:45 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Lindsey Graham
PostPosted: Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7520
Location: Over there! (last)
There's a defense that some Republicans, notably Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), are taking out for a test spin right now. It goes like this:

"What I can tell you about the Trump policy toward Ukraine: It was incoherent, it depends on who you talk to, they seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo, so no I find the whole process to be a sham and I'm not going to legitimize it."

In other words: This might be a crime in the hands of some other administration, but not in the hands of the Trump administration, because they are so incompetent they are incapable of pulling it off. Needless to say, that doesn't quite square with reality—plenty of folks involved here were 100% convinced that an act of extortion was underway. Schiff might also get a lawyer or two to take the stand and point out that incompetence is not actually a valid defense. It's still attempted murder, even if the perpetrator forgets to load the gun.


Lindsey Olin Graham is an American politician, affiliated to the Republican Party, who serves as the senior United States Senator from South Carolina, a seat he has held since 2003. Since 2019, he has been the Chair of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

Born: July 9, 1955 (age 64 years), Central, South Carolina

Height: 5′ 7″

Office: Senator (R-SC) since 2003

Previous Office: Representative, SC 3rd District (1995–2003)

Clay Jones
Image

Kevin Siers
Image

Tom Toles
Image

Bill Bramhall
Image

John Cole
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lindsey Graham
PostPosted: Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7520
Location: Over there! (last)
Steve Sack
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lindsey Graham
PostPosted: Sun Nov 24, 2019 5:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7520
Location: Over there! (last)
Monte Wolverton
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lindsey Graham
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7520
Location: Over there! (last)
Mike Luckovich
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lindsey Graham
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7520
Location: Over there! (last)
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) could be in a little bit of danger, thanks primarily to his flip-floppery. There is another piece of evidence, namely the formation of an anti-Graham super PAC called "Lindsey Must Go."

The group says they've already raised $1 million, and that they think that another $4 million will be no sweat. Given that Graham challenger Jaime Harrison is already leading in the money race, and that a million bucks goes a long way in the Palmetto State, that's no small thing. This does not mean that the race is actually competitive yet, but it does mean that Democratic activists smell some blood in the water. There's no "Tom Cotton Must Go" or "Jim Risch must go" super PAC.

story here :arrow: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/14/democrat-super-pac-oust-lindsey-graham-259165

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lindsey Graham
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 7:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 7520
Location: Over there! (last)
The Founders were fairly well persuaded that many of the judges of their era were in the bag for the King. Since the King was responsible for appointing judges back then, this viewpoint was not necessarily off the mark. Consequently, they strove to make judgeships as non-political as is possible, requiring approval from both of the other branches of government, and giving magistrates life tenure, so as to insulate them from the winds of politics.

Quite clearly, the Founders' ideal of non-political judges did not quite work out. And as time goes by, the number of judges who appear to be political operatives in black robes just grows and grows. On Thursday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, took things to a new low, using an interview with Hugh Hewitt to strongly encourage older conservative judges to retire immediately, so they can be replaced before Donald Trump's first term is up. "This is an historic opportunity," Graham opined. "We've put over 200 federal judges on the bench ... So if you're a circuit judge in your mid-60s, late 60s, you can take senior status, now would be a good time to do that, if you want to make sure the judiciary is right of center."

It is not new for politicians to nudge judges toward retirement. However, it's usually only the biggies (i.e., Supreme Court justices), and generally the politicians have the good taste to be a little bit subtle and (usually) to offer their "encouragement" behind closed doors. For the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee to go on a national radio show and announce that he'd like to see conservative judges retire en masse so that the judiciary can remain as politicized as is possible? That's definitely a new low. At the same time, it feeds right into the Democrats' planned campaign strategy of running on "save the judiciary from a generation (or more) of ultra-conservative control."

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group