Zappa.com

The Official Frank Zappa Messageboards
It is currently Thu Aug 22, 2019 11:33 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13354 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466 ... 535  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:12 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:51 pm
Posts: 33258
Location: >>==> Wellington New Zealand
YOU GO CANADA!

The Yukon Striker: World's tallest, fastest and longest dive coaster now complete
15:22, Feb 08 2019

Image
CANADA WONDERLAND
The Yukon Striker will be the world's largest and tallest dive coaster.

The last piece of roller-coaster track for Yukon Striker was just installed at Canada's Wonderland, marking the completion of what will be the fastest, tallest and longest dive roller coaster in the world.

Located in Canada's Wonderland, which is near Toronto, the Yukon Striker is set to debut at the start of the 2019 season.

Riders will hang for a few seconds at the top before dropping at a 90 degree angle. Yukon Striker's first drop is 75 metres. It travels through an underwater tunnel at the bottom of the first drop. The ride reaches speeds of 130km/h.

Another unique feature of this ride is its complete 360-degree loop, the only one of its kind for a dive coaster. The ride will have four inversions and will be 1100 metres in total length.

There are 16 total roller coasters at Canada's Wonderland. The amusement park features Canada's tallest and fastest coaster - Leviathan, Canada's longest wooden coaster - Mighty Canadian Minebuster, and Canada's first inverted coaster.

"Our talented team has worked for more than a year to bring this complex project to completion," said Peter Switzer, Director of Construction and Maintenance at Canada's Wonderland. "At times it's like solving a puzzle as we integrate a massive roller coaster into the park's landscape with our existing rides, park utilities and underground infrastructure."

Next, the trains will be installed while the loading station and landscaping are completed. After that, the park will begin a thorough ride testing process, which includes running each train through hundreds of cycles around the track; the initial passengers are water dummies that simulate rider weight.

- Stuff with TNS

See the movie :arrow: https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/destinat ... w-complete


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 367
Location: USA
This sort of acceleration deceleration does not shrink your brain after repeated efforts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 6335
Location: Over there! (last)
Image


Last edited by Mr. Nice Guy on Fri Feb 08, 2019 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 8:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 7:45 pm
Posts: 5704
Location: Québec country (let me dream...)
A roller coaster at my age ? Forget it !
I went to Canada's Wonderland in 1982. It was mostly a long suite of T-Shirts sellers at that time.

_________________
No doubt, we're doomed ! For a real diplomacy: abolish Electoral College
Ignore list: DiscoBoy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 6846
Location: Pouting for you? Punky Meadows, pouting for you?!!
Trump and Canadian roller coasters. What's the connection??

_________________
The way I see it Barry, this should be a very dynamite show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 6846
Location: Pouting for you? Punky Meadows, pouting for you?!!
downer mydnyte wrote:
Trump is an actor playing the role of a leader. I don't think he's much of an actor but he's obviously got Mij fooled.

So, he's not a greedy fat bastard who couldn't give a shit about anyone else other than himself and his wealthy mates?

Dag nab it, he's got me fooled too.

_________________
The way I see it Barry, this should be a very dynamite show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:55 pm
Posts: 5396
polydigm wrote:
downer mydnyte wrote:
Trump is an actor playing the role of a leader. I don't think he's much of an actor but he's obviously got Mij fooled.

So, he's not a greedy fat bastard who couldn't give a shit about anyone else other than himself and his wealthy mates?

Dag nab it, he's got me fooled too.

I didn't say he wasn't those things. But if you think he's in charge, yes, you're fooled.

America is an appendage of The Bank Of England.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2019 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 6335
Location: Over there! (last)
Steve Sack
Image

Dave Whamond
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:19 am
Posts: 7535
Location: in deepest, darkest Germany
Image

_________________
"I have learned from my mistakes, and I am sure I can repeat them exactly."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:19 am
Posts: 7535
Location: in deepest, darkest Germany
downer mydnyte wrote:

America is an appendage of The Bank Of England.


So what are America's prospects after Brexit in your opinion, then?

_________________
"I have learned from my mistakes, and I am sure I can repeat them exactly."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 6335
Location: Over there! (last)
Bob Gorrell
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 7:21 am
Posts: 2974
Location: SLS
Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... gn-n970536

WASHINGTON — After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

But investigators disagree along party lines when it comes to the implications of a pattern of contacts they have documented between Trump associates and Russians — contacts that occurred before, during and after Russian intelligence operatives were seeking to help Donald Trump by leaking hacked Democratic emails and attacking his opponent, Hillary Clinton, on social media.

"If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," said Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, in an interview with CBS News last week.

Burr was careful to note that more facts may yet be uncovered, but he also made clear that the investigation was nearing an end.

"We know we're getting to the bottom of the barrel because there're not new questions that we're searching for answers to," Burr said.

Democratic Senate investigators who spoke to NBC News on condition of anonymity did not dispute Burr's characterizations, but said they lacked context.

"We were never going to find a contract signed in blood saying, 'Hey Vlad, we're going to collude,'" one Democratic aide said.

The series of contacts between Trump's associates, his campaign officials, his children and various Russians suggest a campaign willing to accept help from a foreign adversary, the Democrats say.

By many counts, Trump and his associates had more than 100 contacts with Russians before the January 2017 presidential inauguration.



The above sure makes certain people on this forum look very fucking foolish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34471
Location: Somewhere in time
Not at all they have been unable to get the evidence that Mueller is accumulating and their actual position is "something was going on but we can't prove it (i.e. to many people talking to Russians and lying about it when it wasn't necessary)"

Also there seems to be some movement on the over 500 communication in 6 weeks between the Russian Bank Servers and the Trump Tower Servers, that is definitely something untoward.

Keep in mind also signals intelligence we have not seen and the Senate could not see, combined with the cooperation of Flynn, Gates, and others the circle is certainly closing in... :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 11:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 7:21 am
Posts: 2974
Location: SLS
There will probably never be a report from Mueller.

The Senate Investigation Committee has seen and heard everything that Mueller has to offer.
After 2 years of wasted time and money it's discouraging that some people are still looking for the last unicorn.

Hope certain people recover from their meltdowns.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:01 pm
Posts: 2347
pedro1 wrote:
There will probably never be a report from Mueller.

The Senate Investigation Committee has seen and heard everything that Mueller has to offer.
After 2 years of wasted time and money it's discouraging that some people are still looking for the last unicorn.

Hope certain people recover from their meltdowns.


If that's the best you can come up with, my Donald is doomed (psst anyone gotta fake passport :smoke: )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:01 pm
Posts: 2347
Mr. Nice Guy wrote:
Bob Gorrell
Its gotta Maxwell Smart ring to it :smoke:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 6:46 pm
Posts: 573
Location: USA
pedro1 wrote:
There will probably never be a report from Mueller.

The Senate Investigation Committee has seen and heard everything that Mueller has to offer.
After 2 years of wasted time and money it's discouraging that some people are still looking for the last unicorn.

Hope certain people recover from their meltdowns.


There will definitely be a report. Whether that report is made public is the question.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34471
Location: Somewhere in time
pedro1 wrote:
There will probably never be a report from Mueller.

The Senate Investigation Committee has seen and heard everything that Mueller has to offer.
After 2 years of wasted time and money it's discouraging that some people are still looking for the last unicorn.

Hope certain people recover from their meltdowns.



No one outside of Mueller's Investigation Team has seen what they have, the only glimpses we get are in the un-redacted sections of the Federal Court Fillings and what we can deduce doesn't look good for the orangeman...also he has handed off several portions to the SDNY who are very good prosecutors who will get to the bottom of many issues they are investigating including were 107 million dollars for an inauguration party went... :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 7:21 am
Posts: 2974
Location: SLS
Plook wrote:
pedro1 wrote:
There will probably never be a report from Mueller.

The Senate Investigation Committee has seen and heard everything that Mueller has to offer.
After 2 years of wasted time and money it's discouraging that some people are still looking for the last unicorn.

Hope certain people recover from their meltdowns.



the bottom of many issues they are investigating including were 107 million dollars for an inauguration party went... :idea:



Does any of that have to do with COLLUSION , which was the original intent of Mueller's probe ?
Nope.
Moop is probably right when he states that any report will not be made public.
It would harm the Dems way too much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 7:45 pm
Posts: 5704
Location: Québec country (let me dream...)
If you're so sure that there is no collusion, why are you always reminding us that, to you, there's no evidences of collusion ?
...cause you want us to believe you.
Let Muller do his job, cause it's not completed yet, and after that, and only after that, if there's no collusion, you'll wave your freak Trump flag.
But...so far, it doesn't look good.
Think about it... if it was a so sure thing that there's no collusion, why Muller hasn't stop investigating yet ?
Isn't he a Rep ?
:smoke:

_________________
No doubt, we're doomed ! For a real diplomacy: abolish Electoral College
Ignore list: DiscoBoy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 7:21 am
Posts: 2974
Location: SLS
Mij wrote:
If you're so sure that there is no collusion, why are you always reminding us that, to you, there's no evidences of collusion ?
...cause you want us to believe you.
Let Muller do his job, cause it's not completed yet, and after that, and only after that, if there's no collusion, you'll wave your freak Trump flag.
But...so far, it doesn't look good.
Think about it... if it was a so sure thing that there's no collusion, why Muller hasn't stop investigating yet ?
Isn't he a Rep ?
:smoke:


You have a lot of questions, Mij.
I have one for you.
When it finally becomes clear to you that there was no collusion , will you admit you were wrong ?
Nope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:18 pm
Posts: 6335
Location: Over there! (last)
Would you believe I'm taking a meltdown break, in order to post two editorial cartoons. :?

Bruce Plante
Image

Chris Britt
Image

_________________
Image
Never argue with stupid people; they will drag you
down to their level and then beat you with experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: for #LandofDolt45
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 9:14 am
Posts: 5429
1/ Here's the link to the CBS interview w/ Senate Intell Committee Chair Richard Burr. Skeptics reading this thread—who will be stunned by what they read—should understand that the interviewee, Republican Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina, was on TRUMP'S NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM as of October 2016.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/richard-burr-on-senate-intelligence-committees-russia-investigation-2-years-on/
2/ CBS notes that the Senate Intel Committee is entering its third year of a bipartisan Russia probe *despite* intense pressure—particularly from Burr's fellow Republicans—to wrap up its work. That alone is telling: that the Senate majority on the Committee is resisting stopping.
3/ QUOTE #1: "[Burr] acknowledges now that the investigation is broader, and perhaps more consequential, than it has long been thought to be." So America doesn't realize how much troubling material the Senate has found—or how far-flung and important to our future the material is.
4/ QUOTE #2: "What [has]...extended the life of the [Senate] investigation...is a better understanding of...how coordinated and organized the effort was." So it was the "coordination" and "organization" of what Russia did—uh, coordinating with *whom*?—that has shocked the Senate.
5/ And "shock" isn't too strong a word, as Burr says "none of us"—meaning *even the Democrats on the Senate Intel Committee who hate Trump the most*—"ever anticipated that this [investigation] would be two years." Burr made this comment to CBS, CBS says, "solemnly." That's eerie.
6/ QUOTE #3 (CBS): "The [probe] isn't compiling the story of one pivotal election, but of something larger, more complicated and—from a counterintelligence perspective—more nefarious. The final report may be so highly classified that a meaningful portion may not be made public."
7/ As that CBS summary of what Burr said attests, most Americans—but not people who read this feed, I'm happy to say—think Mueller is only discovering info about what happened in "one election." Burr, Trump-Russia analysts, and readers of feeds like this know it's *beyond* that.
8/ According to CBS, per Burr the "story" Trump-Russia investigators are seeing is "larger, more complicated, and more nefarious" than the story of the 2016 election. On this feed, the shorthand we use to describe what the Republican Burr is telling CBS/us is "the grand bargain."
9/ As I write about "the grand bargain," I discuss names major media—and Mueller's indictments thus far—aren't focused on: Dahlan, Nader, Barrack, Broidy, MBS, MBZ, el-Sisi, dozens more.

Burr QUOTE #4: "We've interviewed people I don't know if the special counsel knows about..."
10/ QUOTE #5: "'[This is] work the [Senate Intel] committee will do for the next decade. And it has helped even our intelligence community's understanding of Russia's capabilities and intent behind this.' This was not, he stressed, 'Let's go screw with the Americans in 2016.'"
11/ The implication in Burr's words is chilling: that the "story" is so big the whole Senate Intel Committee needs a *decade* to work on it, and that a big part of the story is Russia's "intent"—which far too many journalists have blithely assumed they know. It goes beyond Trump.
12/ So we have a "larger, more complicated, more nefarious" story behind Russia's "intent" that goes "beyond" one election cycle and will require "a decade" to fully understand. Okay, but is the story limited to Russia's regional interests (e.g., Ukraine, NATO's eastern creep)?
13/ QUOTE #6 (CBS): "The investigation now spans continents and includes sources from countries besides Russia—the [Committee] staff have traveled overseas and witnesses have come in to testify from abroad." So the story of Russia's "intent" involves other regions and continents.
14/ Those who read this feed know which "regions and continents" Russia's "intent" covers besides North America and Russia's immediate neighbors. In fact, *everyone* following the case knows this—though we rarely hear it on TV. The Russia investigation is now about *the Middle East*.
15/ Burr—again, folks, an October 2016 MEMBER OF TRUMP'S NATIONAL SECURITY TEAM—says the unprecedented access the Senate got to U.S. intelligence "gave us tremendous insight to know when somebody was lying to us." He says *many* people have been referred for criminal prosecution.
16/ How crazy is this? *So many people have lied to the Senate Intel Committee* in its Trump-Russia investigation that Richard Burr, once a Trump ally, *won't even tell CBS how many did* except to intimate that it's *a lot*.

Which means *some* (or *many*) new charges are coming.
17/ QUOTE #7: "Though the team's known to work 6 and sometimes 7 days a week, Burr denied it'd taken a toll. 'Morale's great,' he said. 'I think they're fueled by what they find.'" People ask what keeps me (or others who follow Trump-Russia daily) going—it's that. "What we find."
18/ Equally significant is how the Senate team is operating: it's a nine-person *bipartisan team* apparently so *unified* in their concern about what they're finding that they're able to *agree* on nearly everything. That's right: Burr describes a team basically on the same page.
19/ CBS was—it's clear—so surprised about how unified the Senate staff are that it had to tease something not in its story to gain readers: the idea there might be a fight over the final report. But when you see what Burr says about it, it's that he doesn't worry about it at all.
20/ QUOTE #8: "It's hard for me to believe this could fall apart at the easiest point, which is: 'Here are the facts. Write the report.'" Burr's confidence the report won't be a fight suggests that the facts are so obvious and/or damning neither side will need/want to shade them.
21/ But you know who *does* have a murder board? The Senate.
22/ QUOTE #9: "Inside the [Committee's investigative] spaces, the staff have several investigation boards mapping out known connections between witnesses—and a constellation of players whose roles/relationships aren't fully understood." What do you know? A *GOP-run murder board*.
23/ Just imagine how *complex and nefarious* Russia's intent (as to America) has to be for a nine-person Senate staff to be *two years* into an investigation and be using a giant murder board with "a constellation of players whose roles and relationships aren't fully understood."
24/ QUOTE #10: "There've been a lot of people—a lot of people—that none of you [in media] have caught. Not all the interviews [of Trump-Russia witnesses] have taken place up here [on Capitol Hill]." So Burr is saying we haven't even heard of *many* major Trump-Russia figures yet.
25/ Folks like @AlanDersh luxuriate in lying to Americans who don't understand our criminal justice system. They imply that law enforcement reveals its findings as it goes along—rather than only at the end—so if Mueller had anything, we'd know. No we wouldn't'.
26/ What's true for Mueller is *also* true for the *GOP-led Senate Intel Committee*. Not only are they referring for criminal prosecution people they won't tell us about—per a Republican, Burr—they are *also* saying they know about key witnesses *none of us do yet*. Process that.
27/ As CBS reports, when the Committee started it had 3 areas of inquiry; it's had to expand its brief to *5* areas of inquiry. And how much work does it have left? Well, it's released 2 reports and has months left before releasing a third.

And the two biggest ones? No timeline.
28/ The Senate reports with no timeline?

(1) Trump-Russia coordination; and
(2) the *effect* of Russian interference on the 2016 election and beyond.

This would suggest to anyone that these topics are the ones "larger, more complicated, more nefarious" than anyone anticipated.
29/ CBS underscores how much bigger those inquiries are turning out to be with some numbers, especially these two:

(1) The Committee has held ~13 public hearings.
(2) The Committee has interviewed 200+ witnesses.

Do the math. How many witnesses do you think we don't know about?

30/ Despite a dwindling crew of mainstream media journalists (led by @KenDilanianNBC) desperately hawking a prediction that Mueller is almost done, what CBS pulls from its interview with Richard Burr is completely different, and makes up QUOTE #11 in this thread (see next tweet).
31/ QUOTE #11: "Burr and Warner have offered inexact estimates of when the investigation would wind down. It was already supposed to have ended by the end of 2017, by spring 2018, before the midterms, and then by the end of last year." Burr now—"We don't know what we don't know."
32/ So CBS registers what all who follow the Trump-Russia case closely—and have experience with criminal investigations—are saying: *every prior story* claiming the core Trump-Russia investigation was about to shut down has been *false* and no more such stories should be printed.
33/ So how great is the size/scope of this story?

QUOTE #12: "Burr had not wanted to expand the universe of witnesses the committee interviewed, but felt he had little choice. He guessed that the committee had completed interviews with its target list 'fairly early on' in 2017."
34/ So Burr is saying—stunningly—that the Senate came up with, in early 2017, a list of every witness it felt it needed to interview based on the intelligence it had...

...and finished with that list *two years ago*. But Burr says they've been working 6-7 days a week since then.
35/ QUOTE #13: "It's not the people that were on the deck that we knew about that lengthened the time. It was the people we didn't know about that we came to the conclusion—either for the campaign interactions or this bigger picture we're looking at—that extended the timeline."
36/ Burr implies that some witnesses (presumably U.S. witnesses) were so scared to testify before Congress that they *asked to be subpoenaed* so that they could represent (to what nefarious political or other forces we don't know) that they had no choice. What does that tell you?
37/ What some harp on is the end of the story, which tries—as media *won't stop doing*—to freeze in time a probe Burr *just said* has many, *many* years left to go. But CBS couldn't resist: have you found "collusion" right now, with (Burr implied) 8 years of investigation left?
38/ Burr gives a nice quotable answer that'll make Trumpists happy—which is what that quote was clearly intended to do. But his further breakdown leaves doubt. He allows that "collusion" is a possible explanation for the motivations of many of the Trump-Russia ties they've found.

39/ Referring to the Manafort-Kilimnik interactions, Burr calls the argument that they were collusive a "stretch" without dismissing it (and of course he has much, much more investigation of that topic to go). But he allows that "collusion" is one possibility there and elsewhere.
40/ QUOTE #14: "There's an awful lot of connections. They may not be connections that are tied to 2016 elections, but just the sheer fact that they have a relationship—it may be business. It may be Russian intelligence. It may be they're all on the payroll of Oleg Deripaska."
41/ QUOTE #15: "In a lot of cases, we found out they [the Trump-Russia connections the Senate Intelligence Committee has found] fit in neither bucket [listed in QUOTE #14], or we don't know which bucket [yet]." So Burr admits "collusion" may well be the answer to open questions.
42/ Burr says the Senate *hasn't* started its report and *doesn't even know what form it would take*.

But most importantly, he hedges on who the report would please or displease and, contrary to what Trumpists are falsely saying today, doesn't take a final position on collusion.
43/ QUOTE #16: "What I'm telling you is that [the Senate Intelligence Committee] is going to present, as best we can, the facts to [media] and the American people. And you'll have to draw your own conclusion as to whether you think that, by whatever definition, that's collusion."

44/ Burr makes clear that—in his view—it's about "60%" of America that's in the as-yet-undecided group that'll have to decide whether, "by whatever definition...[the report indicates] collusion." He allows that, in addition to the 20% (his view) who see it already, many more may.
45/ But because social media (and media generally) is crappy, the entire CBS interview, which is harrowing for Trump, has now been reduced to a *single pull-quote* that Burr *quite deliberately* threw as red meat to the Trumpists—even though it contradicts his expanded comments.
46/ That is, the Burr interview makes absolutely, 100% crystal clear that "collusion" is *already* a *reasonable interpretation* of EXISTING FACTS—if not one he *personally* adopts—and may well be a reasonable interpretation of STILL-UNDER-INVESTIGATION and AS-YET UNKNOWN facts.
47/ In other words, he's saying collusion will continue to be arguable post-report *based on what he knows now*—with eight years left of work to do. Given that "beyond a reasonable doubt" is the discourse standard here, he's saying some will see that level of proof, and some not.
48/ Folks like @AlanDersh have lied about standards of proof—pretending collusion is a binary (i.e. it 100% exists or 100% doesn't). Burr instead speaks responsibly, noting that some will say collusion exists beyond a reasonable doubt and some will see evidence shy of that level.
49/ Burr's words make clear he *doesn't* discount collusion as a possible explanation for the evidence he's seen—just that there are still enough *other* explanations that he *personally* wouldn't say collusion has been proven to the highest standard of proof. See the difference?
50/ Media—and attorneys like me—have an obligation to contextualize, dissect and explain interviews like Burr's so we can see how they *devastate* both of two key narratives: (1) that the Trump-Russia investigation is almost done *or* (2) that there is *no* evidence of collusion...."

_________________
" . . . On the outside now . . ."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 5:48 pm
Posts: 34471
Location: Somewhere in time
pedro1 wrote:
When it finally becomes clear to you that there was no collusion , will you admit you were wrong ?
Nope.


Actually collusion is a for gone conclusion, whether or not its was criminal is what is in question...you can not be meeting with foreign adversary and exchanging material and requests as the Trump Team did without out colluding, what they have admitted to and confirmed is by its very essence collusion...collusion per-se is not a crime, stupid and unpatriotic yes but other elements need to be present for the crime.

This is why trump fears and attempts to lie about the obvious fact that collusion exists, that being established as it is by testimony and documents opens the door to discover the crime, and the mere fact that they were offering Russian Oligarchs sanction relief in exchange to build buildings alone is a crime, and before you say they never completed the deal remember you don't have to successfully rob a bank to get convicted for attempting too, conspiracy (planning) to commit a felony is a felony... :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: TRUMP
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 7:45 pm
Posts: 5704
Location: Québec country (let me dream...)
pedro1 wrote:
Mij wrote:
If you're so sure that there is no collusion, why are you always reminding us that, to you, there's no evidences of collusion ?
...cause you want us to believe you.
Let Muller do his job, cause it's not completed yet, and after that, and only after that, if there's no collusion, you'll wave your freak Trump flag.
But...so far, it doesn't look good.
Think about it... if it was a so sure thing that there's no collusion, why Muller hasn't stop investigating yet ?
Isn't he a Rep ?
:smoke:


You have a lot of questions, Mij.
I have one for you.
When it finally becomes clear to you that there was no collusion , will you admit you were wrong ?
Nope.


You don't know me !
I hate Trump cause he's a bad man, and really not fit to be a leader.
But I love truth above all.
Which is not the case of all Trump's lovers.
If he's not involved, I will tell so.,. don't worry !
You suppose I won't. You're one-sided.
Meanwhile, it doesn't look good for your orange baboon....
:smoke:

_________________
No doubt, we're doomed ! For a real diplomacy: abolish Electoral College
Ignore list: DiscoBoy


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13354 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466 ... 535  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group